马克思主义哲学实践范畴的界定——兼评实践泛化论和实践狭化论

The Demarcation of Practice in Marxist philosophy——Also comments on the generalization and narrow th

  • 摘要: 关于实践范畴的外延学界长期存在争议,两个基本倾向是泛化和狭化。外延的准确界定需要内涵的精确把握,在重新解读实践内涵的过程中,我们必须坚持两个原则:一是在哲学史中理解实践,二是把实践作为一个统一体进行研究。依此原则,我们的结论是:不是用物质或者精神规定实践,而是用实践规定物质和精神。实践是人类全部生活的基础,但是,不是所有人类活动都是实践。判断实践的标准是能动性和现实性的统一。在此基础上,依据马克思的《资本论》及其手稿为核心文本,我们对物质活动、交往活动和精神活动分别做了比较精确的实践界定,明确了它们的内涵和外延。西方存在主义马克思主义哲学家萨特的历史人类学中关于集合和群体的论述,以及当代中国化马克思主义哲学的一些成果给了我们重要启示

     

    Abstract: The category of practice in Marxist philosophy in an important position is self-evident,but the connotation and extension of it is in a long-standing dispute.Two basic tendencies are the generalization and narrow.The accurate extension needs the exact definition.In the interpretation of the connotation of practice,we must adhere to two principles:one is to understand the practice in the history of philosophy;the other is to take the practice as a unity.According to them,we not only reveal errors...

     

/

返回文章
返回