戴震思想“分期说”评议

A Commentary on the Stage Division of DAI Zhen

  • 摘要: 对戴震思想的"分期"研究由来已久,这一研究模式致力于戴震的早期与晚期之间划分出明确的界限,但其结果却形成了"考据学家戴震"与"义理学者戴震"两个难以兼容的形象,为我们理解其学问主旨造成了困难。"分期说"的主要缺陷是立论前提与论据使用的不当。唯有摆脱"分期说",依照"通经以明道"这一贯穿戴震一生的学问路径,我们才能对戴震形成前后一贯的理解。

     

    Abstract: The 'stage division' of Dai Zhen's thought has been widely accepted.However,this argument placed great obstacles in comprehending DAI Zhen's thought as a coherent system.In section Ⅰ,the paper argues that the 'division' overemphasizes on the differences between Dai Zhen's thought in early years and in afterlife,splits Dai Zhen into a philologist and a philosopher,and makes it impossible to comprehend his thought as a whole.The argument in section Ⅱ shows that the 'division' originated from the c...

     

/

返回文章
返回