关于古汉语“为动用法”的再认识

The recognition about weidong yongfa(为动用法) in ancient Chinese

  • 摘要: 与"为动用法"相关的名目有"两多说"(多动、多宾)、"介动用法"说和取消说。"两多说"的致命弱点在于只满足于归纳繁多的名目,违背了语法学的概括性原则,受到"介动用法"说和取消说的共同批评。而"介动用法"说与"使动用法""意动用法"很难构成"鼎足三分"关系,且其语例中阑入了其他语言现象。在适当的范围里,"介动用法"中的介词,可以集中到一个介词"为"上。"为动用法"有其自身的优势,它将成为经过人们的一番探索、对相关语言现象的认识得以深化之后新的落脚点,并将得到更为广泛的认同。

     

    Abstract: There are several statements which are about Weidong Yongfa, such as Liangduo Argument(两多说),i.e., Duodong(多动), Duobin(多宾), Jiedong Yongfa Argument(介动用法说) and Cancel Argument. Liangduo Argu-ment's fatal defect is that it is just content with listing numerous items which were criticized by the othertwo arguments because it violate the grammatical generality principle. Jiedong Argument is so simple that itcan't from a third equally important argument, and moreover, this argument put in other linguistic phen...

     

/

返回文章
返回