关于完善国家社科基金项目评审制度的若干思考

System perfecting:appraisal and approval of the national social science fund items in China

  • 摘要: 现行的国家社会科学项目评审制度在实践中证明是行之有效的,但仍存在不足,主要是学科评审专家的遴选多是从一级学科层次上考虑,且只通过他们的一次会议评审确定立项和资助额。为保证基金项目评审立项的科学性和公正性,有必要建立一个包括同行评议制度、回避制度,违纪处理制度、申诉制度、监督制度以及项目成果公开制度在内的管理体系。其中构建专家库和每年同行评议专家的选择非常重要

     

    Abstract: The existing national social scinence fund items appraising and approving system has been proved to be offective except that most experts have been chosen according to their first-grade subjects and items are to be discussed and determined by only one meeting of them.To improve the work, a system which includes experts evaluation,advoidunce,punishment,appealing,supervising and publishing items achievements must be set up. And among all of these regulations,building and army of experts and choosing properly ...

     

/

返回文章
返回