反应竞争和提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响

林忻, 孟迎芳, 黄丽琴

林忻, 孟迎芳, 黄丽琴. 反应竞争和提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》. DOI: 10.3969/ji.ssn.1003-0964.2019.06.001
引用本文: 林忻, 孟迎芳, 黄丽琴. 反应竞争和提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》. DOI: 10.3969/ji.ssn.1003-0964.2019.06.001
LINXin, MENGYingfang, HUANGLiqin. TheEffectofCompetitionontheInterferenceEffectonRetrievalProcessinImplicitMemory[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition). DOI: 10.3969/ji.ssn.1003-0964.2019.06.001
Citation: LINXin, MENGYingfang, HUANGLiqin. TheEffectofCompetitionontheInterferenceEffectonRetrievalProcessinImplicitMemory[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition). DOI: 10.3969/ji.ssn.1003-0964.2019.06.001

反应竞争和提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金青年项目(31800906)

2018年福建省自然基金面上项目(2018J01719)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    林忻(1995—),女,福建福州人,硕士,研究方向:认知与学习;孟迎芳(1978—),女,福建浦城人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:认知与学习

  • 中图分类号: B84

TheEffectofCompetitionontheInterferenceEffectonRetrievalProcessinImplicitMemory

  • 摘要: 为探讨提取干扰是否会影响语义分类任务中的概念启动效应,以及该影响是否源于动作反应资 源的竞争,实验分成无干扰、同时干扰和继时干扰三种条件,在继时干扰条件下设置有反应竞争与无反应竞 争两种条件,实验结果表明,提取干扰会影响概念启动效应,只要存在提取干扰,启动效应就会被破坏,但仅 在继时干扰有反应竞争时才存在负启动效应。因此,提取干扰效应源于双任务操作中注意资源的分散,而反 应竞争会在此基础上更大地破坏启动效应。
    Abstract: Thepurposeofthisstudywastoexplorewhetherextractioninterferencecouldaffecttheconceptprimingeffect insemanticclassificationtasks,andwhethertheeffectoriginatedfromthecompetitionofactionresponseresources.Theexperi- mentwasdividedintonon-interferencecondition,simultaneousinterferenceconditionandcontinuousinterferencecondition. Underthecontinuousinterferencecondition,therearetwoconditionsofreactivecompetitionandnon-reactivecompetition.The experimentalresultsshowthatthereisaconceptualprimingeffectinsemanticclassificationtasksintheconditionofnon-inter- ference.Theprimingeffectofsemanticclassificationtaskdisappearsundertheconditionofsimultaneousinterference.The primingeffectdisappearedundertheconditionofnon-reactivecompetition,whilethenegativeprimingeffectoccurredunderthe conditionofreactivecompetition.Theresultsshowthattheextractioninterferencealsoaffectstheconceptualprimingeffect, butthenegativeprimingeffectonlyoccurssubsequentinterferencehadreactivecompetition.Therefore,conceptualimplicit memoryisaffectedbyextractinginterference,andextractinginterferenceeffectcomesfromDistractionindual-taskoperation, Onthisbasis,responsecompetitionwillgreatlydestroytheprimingeffect.
  • [1] 徐大真. 中国内隐记忆研究综述[J]. 信阳师范学院学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2001, 21(4): 40-43.
    [2]

    MULLIGAN N W. The role of attention during enco-ding in implicit and explicit memory[J] Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cogni-tion, 1998, 24(24): 27-47. 

    [3]

    MULLIGAN N W, Peterson D. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks[J] Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 2008, 34(3): 662-679.

    [4] 孟迎芳, 郭春彦. 编码与提取干扰对内隐和外显记忆的非对称性影响[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(4): 579-588.
    [5] 孟迎芳, 郭春彦. 内隐与外显记忆的编码与提取非对称性关系[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(8): 694-705.
    [6]

    LOZITO J P, MULLIGAN N W. Exploring the role of attention during implicit memory retrieval[J] Jour- nal of Memory & Language, 2010, 63(3): 387-399.

    [7] 孟迎芳, 于海莉. 内隐记忆与外显记忆编码与提取加工的分离 [J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2012 (3): 50-55.
    [8] 蔡超群, 孟迎芳. 双语词汇理解切换中非目标语言加工[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(1): 55-60.
    [9] 唐小庭. 提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2013.
    [10]

    MULLIGAN N W. Effects of cross-modal and in-tramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory[J] Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 2003, 29(2): 262-276.

    [11]

    GABRIELIJDE, VAIDYACJ, STONE M, et al. Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evi- dence for a distinction between identification and pro- duction forms of repetition priming[J] Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: General, 1999, 128 (4): 479-498.

    [12] 林无忌, 孟迎芳, 林静远. 提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 49-60.
    [13]

    JONG D,RITSKE. Multiple bottlenecks in overlap- ping task performance[J] Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993,19(5): 965-980.

    [14]

    THOMAS T, TILO S, TORSTEN S, et al. The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation? [J] Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 2012, 6: 1-10.

    [15] 吴彦文, 游旭群, 李海霞. 注意力资源限制与双任务的相互干扰机制[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 174-184.
    [16]

    FLEISCHMAN D A, VAIDYACJ, LANGE K L, et al. A Dissociation between Perceptua lExplicit and Implicit Memory Processes[J] Brain & Cognition, 1997, 35(1):1-57.

    [17]

    ELLIOTT R, DOLAN R J. Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: a functional neuroimaging study[J] Journalof Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1998, 18(12): 213-217.

    [18]

    WIGGS C L, MARTIN A. Properties and mecha- nisms of perceptual priming[J] Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 1998, 8(2): 227-233.

    [19]

    RATCLIFF R, MCKOON G. A countermodel for implicit priming in perceptual word identification[J] Psychological Review, 1997, 104(2): 319-343. 

    [20]

    TULVING E. Concepts of human memory.[J] Memory Organization & Locusof Change, 1991, 3-32.

    [21]

    PASHLER H. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?[J] Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception&Performance, 1994, 20(2): 330-342.

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 王贇芝,王雪,查先进. 弹幕视频网站用户从众信息评论行为驱动因素探索. 信息资源管理学报. 2020(04): 60-69 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  4414
  • HTML全文浏览量:  149
  • PDF下载量:  740
  • 被引次数: 6
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-10-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回