中国城市内部公共服务均等化的空间差异及收敛性

Spatial Difference and Convergence of Equalization of Public Services Inside Cities in China

  • 摘要: 基于2000-2018年中国7个大城市市辖区数据,测度城市内部公共服务均等化指数,分析其空间差异和收敛特征。研究表明:各城市内部公共服务均等化总体差异明显,其中上海均等化水平最高,而石家庄均等化水平最低;北京、天津和上海城区内公共服务均等化水平较低,且低于郊区内水平,而广州、南京和石家庄城区内公共服务均等化水平较高,且高于郊区内水平;上海和广州城郊间公共服务均等化差异程度最低;城郊间差异是北京、重庆和南京内部公共服务均等化总体差异主要来源,而城郊内差异是天津、上海、广州和石家庄内部公共服务均等化总体差异的主要来源;中国城市内部公共服务均等化水平存在明显的绝对β收敛趋势和条件β收敛趋势。

     

    Abstract: Based on the data from the municipal districts of seven major cities in China from 2000 to 2018, this paper measures equalization index of public services inside cities, and analyzes its spatial difference and convergence characteristics. The results show that there are obvious differences in the overall equalization of public services inside cities in China, and Shanghai has the highest level of equalization and Shijiazhuang has the lowest level of equalization. The level of equalization of public services in the urban areas of Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai is relatively low and lower than the level in the suburbs, while the level of equalization of public services in the urban areas of Guangzhou, Nanjing and Shijiazhuang is relatively high and higher than the level in the suburbs. The difference in public service equalization between urban and suburban areas of Shanghai and Guangzhou is the lowest. The difference between urban and suburban areas is the main source of the overall difference in the equalization of public services in Beijing, Chongqing and Nanjing, while the difference within the urban and suburban areas is the main source of the overall difference in the equalization of public services in Tianjin, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shijiazhuang. There are obvious absolute β convergence trends and conditional β convergence trends in the level of equalization of public services inside cities in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回