论代持股权强制执行中隐名股东的法律地位

Legal Status of Dormant Shareholders in the Enforcement of Equity Holdings

  • 摘要: 在代持股权被名义股东的债权人申请强制执行时,隐名股东为实现投资权益显名化将自己变更为登记股东,在诉讼选择上,不应在执行异议之诉中一并提起股权确认之诉,而应先通过执行异议之诉排除强制执行,再提起股权变更之诉。隐名股东的股东资格认定应以区分说为标准,与外部关系无必然的联系。外部关系适用外观主义原则,名义股东的债权人属于《公司法》第32条第3款规定的“第三人”范畴,在隐名股东怠于消除股权登记不一致的权利外观且名义股东的债权人为善意时,隐名股东不能排除名义股东债权人的强制执行。

     

    Abstract: When the creditor of the nominal shareholder applies for compulsory execution on behalf of the holding equity, the anonymous shareholder changes himself into a registered shareholder in order to manifest the investment equity. In the choice of litigation, the lawsuit of equity confirmation should not be brought together with the lawsuit of execution objection, but the enforcement should be ruled out first through the lawsuit of execution objection, and then the lawsuit of equity change should be brought. The identification of dormant shareholders' shareholder qualification should be based on the distinction theory, which has no necessary connection with external relations. Externalism applies to external relations, and the creditors of nominal shareholders belong to the category of the third party stipulated in Article 32, paragraph 3 of Company Law. When the anonymous shareholders are lazy to eliminate the inconsistent appearance of rights in equity registration and the creditors of nominal shareholders are in good faith, the anonymous shareholders cannot exclude the enforcement of creditors of nominal shareholders.

     

/

返回文章
返回