马志林. 再论“周民族的史诗”[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2020, 40(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2020.04.017
引用本文: 马志林. 再论“周民族的史诗”[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2020, 40(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2020.04.017
MA Zhilin. Rediscussion on Epic of Zhou Nationality[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2020, 40(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2020.04.017
Citation: MA Zhilin. Rediscussion on Epic of Zhou Nationality[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2020, 40(4): 110-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2020.04.017

再论“周民族的史诗”

Rediscussion on Epic of Zhou Nationality

  • 摘要: 关于《诗经》中有没有史诗的争论实自黑格尔起,所谓“周民族的史诗”的定论是逐步形成的,其实《诗经》中根本没有史诗。遵循亚里士多德、马克思等关于史诗定义之标准,揆诸经典史诗的共性,发现《崧高》《烝民》《韩奕》《江汉》《常武》等所谓周民族的史诗不具备史诗特征,其一是无整一的行动,二是不具备史诗三要素,三是无神人互动之关系,四是作诗的目的根本不在于创作史诗。这些诗乃是周人纪念先祖的叙事性的庙堂乐歌。

     

    Abstract: The controversy about whether there is an epic in The Book of Songs starts from Hegel, and the conclusion of the so-called epic of Zhou nationality is gradually formed. In fact, there is no epic in The Book of Songs. Considering the definitions of epic by Aristotle, Marx, etc, and looking at the generality of classical epics, the so-called epics such as Song Gao, Zheng Min, Han Yi, Jiang Han, Chang Wu, etc. of the Zhou nationality have the following characteristics:fristly, without a concerted action; secondly, without the three elements of epic; thirdly, without interaction of gods and people; and fourthly, without the purpose of creating epics at all. These poems are the narrative temple songs of the Zhou people commemorating their ancestors.

     

/

返回文章
返回