孟祥笑, 游耀旺. 参军戏起源问题再探讨[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2018, 38(5): 111-113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.05.023
引用本文: 孟祥笑, 游耀旺. 参军戏起源问题再探讨[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2018, 38(5): 111-113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.05.023
MENG Xiangxiao, YOU Yaowang. Re-discussion on the Origin of the Canjun Drama[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2018, 38(5): 111-113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.05.023
Citation: MENG Xiangxiao, YOU Yaowang. Re-discussion on the Origin of the Canjun Drama[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2018, 38(5): 111-113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.05.023

参军戏起源问题再探讨

Re-discussion on the Origin of the Canjun Drama

  • 摘要: 关于参军戏的起源,讨论的重点历来集中在参军名目及其产生的年代上。然而,从戏剧发生学和形态学的角度来说,职官序列中有无参军并非判断参军戏起源的主要标准,是否具有扮演特征才是问题的关键。结合相关文献可知,"石躭说"所述故事尚为戏剧化的生活场景,乃参军戏的本事;"周延说"中始具备扮演的性质,系以艺术再现生活,参军戏当由此形成并发展起来。

     

    Abstract: When talking about the origin of the Canjun drama (参军戏), the key points has been focused on the names of Canjun and its generation age. However, from the origin and morphology of drama, the Canjun official is not the cardinal criterion to judge the origin of Canjun drama. But the part-playing characteristics are the key problem. According to the relevant literature, the story of SHI Dan (石躭说) is still a dramatic life scene, which is the story source of Canjun drama, while the story of ZHOUYan (周延说) has the nature of the play, and recreates the life artistically, based on which the Canjun drama took initial shape and developed.

     

/

返回文章
返回