孟凡芹, 曲鑫建. 中国高等教育质量标准演变历程及反思[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2018, 38(4): 75-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.04.015
引用本文: 孟凡芹, 曲鑫建. 中国高等教育质量标准演变历程及反思[J]. 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2018, 38(4): 75-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.04.015
MENG Fanqin, . On the Evolution of Quality Standards in China's Higher Education[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2018, 38(4): 75-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.04.015
Citation: MENG Fanqin, . On the Evolution of Quality Standards in China's Higher Education[J]. The journal of xinyang normal university (philosophy and social science edition), 2018, 38(4): 75-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2018.04.015

中国高等教育质量标准演变历程及反思

On the Evolution of Quality Standards in China's Higher Education

  • 摘要: 高等教育质量管理问题是关系国家教育发展的重要问题,与高等教育理念、管理以及环境息息相关。基于学术—保证—问责三维分析框架对中国高等教育质量管理制度变迁历程进行分析发现,政府规约、国际化冲击及自身发展等多重压力共同塑造了中国高等教育质量管理模式之独特性,政策化取向及大学文化功利主义倾向是高等教育质量管理制度变迁的主因。新时代中国高等教育管理应在国家调控、院校自治和市场调节三种力量之间平衡张力,使中国大学治理转向中国特色高等教育质量管理之新范式。

     

    Abstract: Higher education quality management is extremely important in the development of national education, which is closely related to the educational concept, educational management and external environment. This paper aims to comb the quality management policy of China's higher education based on the three-dimensional framework of academic-assurance-accountability, to explore Chinese model characteristics of higher education quality management, and further to analyze the evolution mechanism of its mode shaped. In the conclusions, we have discovered that Chinese universities undertake multiple pressures, such as government regulations, internationalization challenge and self-development, which shape Chinese model characteristics, and reveal the major causes of the evolution mechanism, which are the policy-orientation in higher education reform process and utilitarian-tendency of university culture. It is necessary to construct the new paradigm for Chinese university governance with the balance tension amongst government management, institutional autonomy and market regulation.

     

/

返回文章
返回